Articles From Experts
| Please Note that these articles are only for advice and can help in motivation and decision making. We urge the readers to take expert advice before making final decisions. | |||||
|
Express Newsline Articles From Experts |
|
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ensuring Solutions to Alcohol Problem ( ESAP) researchers discovered that at least 10 major plans in 5 states were not in compliance with state laws governing insurance coverage for alcoholism treatment and further details were given by ESAP director Eric Goplerud, saying that the most common violation discovered was that they were not allowing people with alcoholism to remain in treatment-either inpatient or outpatient-as long as the laws in their states require.Goplerud called upon state legislators to more carefully monitor the insurers. Research indicates that longer duration of treatment improves the chances that a patient will recover. Noncompliance can affect state budgets by shifting more of the cost to treat alcohol problems from the private sector to the public sector, even though the majority of people who need alcohol treatment are employed. Other violations of state law by employer-based health insurance plans included higher insurance co-payments, which research shows discourages patients from seeking alcohol treatment; coverage for detoxification services only, which are insufficient for treating alcoholism; and no coverage for detoxification services, which are medically necessary for alcohol-dependent patients.ESAP researchers examined 70 health plans in 36 states and the District of Columbia. For purposes of the study, states were categorized according to their insurance laws: · Parity (P): 7 states in which insurers must provide the same level coverage for alcohol treatment as for other illnesses;· Mandated Minimum (MM): 20 states in which insurers must provide a minimum level of coverage for alcohol treatment, though typically at a lower level than that for other illnesses;· Mandated Offering (MO): 17 states require insurers to offer the purchasers of employer-based health plans the option of a plan that includes alcohol treatment; and· No Laws: 6 states do not require insurers to offer alcohol treatment coverage of any kindThe insurers, provided they would remain unnamed in this study, provided ESAP copies of summary plan descriptions of their health insurance products that covered the greatest number of beneficiaries. These descriptions outline the scope of coverage, and must accurately summarize for beneficiaries the extent of contractually covered benefits. Researchers then compared the alcohol treatment benefits drawn from the plan descriptions to abstracted information about states' alcohol health insurance laws as of December 1, 2002. The new analysis continues the work begun by ESAP with Workplace Solutions: Treating Alcohol Problems Through-Employment-Based Health Insurance, a research report published in December 2002 and is available on-line.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
